He said, he said | Sports News, The Indian Express

hardik pandya, kl rahul, koffee with karan, karan johar, bcci, bcci suspension, sexist comment, supreme court, cricket, cricket news, sports, sports news, indian expressIn Koffee With Karan, the 25-year-old Pandya and his teammate Ok L Rahul, 26, boasted about hooking up with more than one girls and in addition how open that they had been about it with their oldsters and circle of relatives.

The precise second when it hit him that he has develop into a villain isn’t identified, however hours after India gained the Take a look at collection within the first week of this yr, Hardik Pandya was once on a top about his now notorious chat with Karan Johar. Past due to sign up for the squad on account of damage, he was once speaking in regards to the talk-show to someone who cared to concentrate — take a look at, all of the nation is speaking about me. Phrases to that impact. It was once nonetheless within the ‘cool’ territory. Regardless of taking no section in India’s ancient win over Australia, he had stayed in information.

On Johar’s display, Koffee With Karan, because the talk-show host baited them with questions on girls — those that they had dated, had intercourse with, their favorite pick-up line — the 25-year-old Pandya and his teammate Ok L Rahul, 26, boasted about hooking up with more than one girls and in addition how open that they had been about it with their oldsters and circle of relatives.

However what was once in all probability extra harmful was once the rapid-fire phase at the display. Right here, as Johar asks the 2 if that they had “finished it” in a teammate’s room, each Pandya and Rahul reply with a powerful “sure”. From there on, the solutions stay lifting the iron curtain between the enthusiasts and their cricketing heroes, and Johar helps to keep urgent. He asks if they have got “long gone above and past to ‘attach’ with a fan after the tournament”, and, with Johar pushing him, Rahul replies: “Oh, that method? Yeah, I’ve.” He additionally is going on to discuss how he as soon as partied until five am at the eve of a global recreation.

It was once particularly this a part of the display that didn’t cross down neatly with the staff and the cricket directors. For, it hinted at a anxious staff tradition and in addition uncovered the frailty of the wall across the gamers that anti-corruption officers stay speaking about. Was once it really easy for outsiders to sneak into the staff resort? Aren’t there curfew hours earlier than a large recreation?

Within the days following the telecast of the display on January 6, issues would dramatically spin out of keep an eye on for the 2 gamers. Pandya was once hoping to be a part of the ODI collection, however was once in peril of being banned from the facet. Assets speak about how he would put on a haunted glance and do his highest to learn the way many suits, if any, he must omit. The gravity of the episode had hit him.


What he didn’t learn

In 2017, the BCCI issued a gamers’ guide titled ‘100 issues each skilled cricketer will have to know’ which was once in accordance with Justice R M Lodha’s suggestions. It lined a variety of subjects from health and vitamin, to media interactions and managing funds. Web page 77 of the guide titled ‘10 issues about media interplay’ has an image, mockingly, of Ok L Rahul (see proper), with a caption that claims: “Ahead of the interplay is to start, one may assume thru a couple of tough or ‘trick’ questions which may be requested and the solutions one want to give to them.” It additionally warns gamers in regards to the motives of the interviewer: “You wish to have to keep in mind that a journalist can have a reason — to sensationalise or construct a tale that will be of industrial receive advantages to their organisation… You want to merely say ‘That’s now not one thing I need to speak about’ or ‘I haven’t any remark to make about that’.” A blurb at the web page has an M S Dhoni quote: “You may have each proper to invite me that. It’s your prerogative. However I’ve the suitable not to solution.”

An Indian cricket board professional, who has been interacting with the 2 gamers, says a line from Pandya has stayed in his thoughts. “He advised me, ‘I encourage you to permit me to proceed taking part in for India, sir’,” says the professional.

Again in India, Vinod Rai and Diana Edulji, individuals of the Best Courtroom-appointed Committee of Directors (COA), who’ve been on a warpath with every different, differed as soon as once more.

Rai to start with mentioned banning each the cricketers for 2 suits, however later requested Edulji to take a choice. After taking a prison opinion, Edulji requested the gamers to go back house.

However there was once the query of probing the 2 cricketers over what they stated at the display, and right here too, Edulji and Rai had been on reverse facets. Whilst Rai sought after BCCI CEO Rahul Johri to habits the initial enquiry, Edulji identified the flaw in that decision within the wake of the sexual allegations in opposition to the CEO. “It’s unhealthy optics and COA might be criticised for it… In regards to the CEO, he was once cleared via you, now not me,” Edulji wrote to Rai.

The prison opinion that Edulji took states that pending inquiry, the gamers will also be suspended, and an ad-hoc ombudsman be appointed to maintain the probe. With Rai and Edulji disagreeing on that appointment,

as issues stand, on Friday, the apex courtroom postponed the listening to to subsequent week. The limbo continues.

“How are you able to be expecting them to be with the Indian staff now? They are going to fly again house,” Edulji had advised this newspaper.

Whilst Rai, in his mail to Edulji and different board officers, described the gamers’ “off-the-ground act” as “deplorable”, he additionally spoke in regards to the wish to take “corrective motion, sensitise them in their misdemeanour after which get them again directly to the bottom as soon as they have got suffered the effects”. He additionally stated the purpose was once to not deliver their profession “to a cul-de-sac via indefinitely delaying a choice”.

“BCCI isn’t within the industry of finishing younger careers. Please be confident that the need to habits the inquiry isn’t a need to ‘quilt up’,” he wrote.


Pandya and Rahul. Two gamers who had been being mentioned, till this controversy, as being amongst India’s greatest unearths — Pandya, an extraordinary pace-bowling all-rounder that Indian cricket has been looking ahead to because the Kapil Dev technology, and Rahul, a top-order batsman who, the staff hopes, will adapt to all codecs of the sport.

Whilst Pandya, a Elegance nine dropout, has a tale of fight, of a father who invested his all to get his two sons to play cricket, of days spent taking part in the sport with only a meal of Maggi, Rahul’s oldsters, each teachers, insisted he protected a college level earlier than he chased his dream to play for India.

Whilst the newest controversy may put the brakes on their profession, the trail that ended in Pandya and Rahul bragging about their sexual prowess has been traversed via others earlier than. Ahead of Fb changed into widespread, there was once Orkut, the pages of which, even though cleaned now, used to carry sexist feedback from a couple of Indian cricketers who’re giant nowadays. They had been youngsters then and would publicly chat with fellow cricketers about their sexual ‘conquests’. Of their defence, they had been youngsters, they weren’t making their perspectives public on a TV chat display, and, a minimum of of their minds, the ones had been virtually non-public conversations.

Issues have modified. Within the publish MeToo global, the endurance has run out on such behaviour because the outrage in opposition to Pandya and Rahul presentations. In his apology, Pandya mentioned “being over excited with the character of the display”. On final season’s Koffee With Karan, Johar had hosted actors Ranbir Kapoor and Ranveer Singh, the place probably the most questions was once about whether or not they have got had intercourse with a pal’s female friend. Ranbir stated sure. The opposite query was once whether or not they had “finished it” on planes. Each stated sure, to squeals of laughter. So Pandya isn’t completely off the mark when he talks in regards to the “nature of the display”.

However had Pandya and Rahul thumbed during the BCCI-approved guide for gamers, titled ‘100 Issues Each and every Skilled Cricketer Will have to Know’, which gives ideas on easy methods to maintain the media and habits themselves, they almost certainly would were in a greater position.

A few years in the past, after the CoA took over, the BCCI had commissioned this guide that was once stated to be in keeping with Justice R M Lodha’s suggestions. It has a foreword via former India captain Rahul Dravid.

Web page 77 of this guide, below the Segment ‘10 issues about media interplay’, reads: “A twinkling of an eye earlier than the interplay is to start, one may assume thru a couple of tough or ‘trick’ questions which may be requested…” The phase additionally tells gamers to “In finding out what sort of record/display the journalist intends to supply” and “Make a listing of items to steer clear of speaking about”. The pages of his guide are interspersed with pictures of the gamers and, coincidentally, this phase comes with KL Rahul’s image.

There are extra phrases of knowledge on web page 76 below the headline: “What are tactics to steer clear of media-related controversies.” Right here gamers also are skilled at the motives the interviewer could have. “You wish to have to keep in mind that a journalist can have a reason – to sensationalise or construct a tale that will be of industrial receive advantages to their organisation… You want to merely say “That’s now not one thing I need to speak about” or “I haven’t any remark to make about that.”

Then there’s the query of get right of entry to to cricketers. The ones on cricket circuit say get right of entry to is so much more straightforward for most people when the staff is traveling. “In India, all over world suits, we also have police on our resort flooring. It’s now not all the time simple for someone to return into your room. However in a foreign country, they generally simply have one safety officer and we gamers can simply inform them that we’re getting a pal over.”

This is the place the Pandya-Rahul case will get difficult. For a tender cricketer strolling into the facet, the stardom, glamour and massive greenbacks which might be a part of the Indian cricketing ecosystem are infrequently sobering.

Again within the 70s, or even additional again, such speak was once regarded as at highest, locker-room dialog, and at worst, “having a just right lifestyles”. A Sri Lankan cricketer of an previous technology as soon as recounted to this correspondent intercourse stories from the previous about giant gamers from everywhere in the global. “Ladies would queue as much as have intercourse with him…”, he would say a couple of explicit cricketer, and “he would skip coaching periods to have an orgy within the room” about every other. Shane Warne’s revelations about his notorious threesome with two fashions and an inflatable intercourse doll, and Ian Botham’s damaged beds have sustained the cricketing global’s gossip trade for years.

The Indian Premier League (IPL), when it introduced 2008, served to additional bedazzle younger minds for being a continuing birthday celebration with some cricket thrown at the facet. The cash too was once in contrast to anything else the gamers had identified earlier than.

“It was once all available in the market without spending a dime. I might say issues have modified in contemporary few years however no doubt within the previous years, the birthday celebration scene in IPL was once a lot mentioned via us gamers,” says an Indian cricketer. “You’re a younger participant and you spot these kinds of well-known cricketers from in all places the arena do stuff — you do really feel that it’s all customary and a part of being cool.”

Whilst his teammates, privately or even publically, speak about his “cool-dude symbol”, and the way he is going to nice lengths to maintain that, individuals who know him, like his early life trainer Jitendra Singh have all the time stressed out the opposite, softer facet of him —

how he introduced monetary assist when the trainer’s mom was once sick or how he talented a automobile as gurudakshina.

In the meantime, Hardik’s father has stated his son has neither stepped out of the house since his go back from Australia nor has he been taking calls.


It’s learnt that the staff control wasn’t to start with certain whether or not the gamers must be despatched again house. They had been positive with postponing them for a couple of video games and transferring on – hanging the debate in the back of and that specialize in making ready for the International Cup.

However because the row snowballed into one thing larger, there was once no method however to behave.

Sunil Gavaskar was once amongst those that sought after the 2 gamers to be stored out of the staff. “They’ve to be stored away. Another way, what’s the purpose of the suspension? If they’re going to benefit from the perks of being with the staff,” he stated.

“It was once so crass. When the debate first erupted, I used to be stunned, questioning what (Pandya) can have stated that brought about one of these massive drama. Then I noticed the display. It was once so disappointing and crass. It’s surprising that he idea he may proportion all that to the arena,” says a member of the present India contingent.

Harbhajan Singh too had lashed out after the debate, announcing, “I can now not trip with those two guys within the bus if my daughter or my spouse are travelling within the staff bus. How would they really feel? You’re looking at girls in just one perspective and that isn’t proper.”

The gamers have, alternatively, discovered beef up from former captain Sourav Ganguly, who stated that even though he hasn’t noticed the display, he was once of the opinion that they must be forgiven. “Other people make errors. Let’s now not cross too some distance right here. I’m certain they’ll pop out as higher individuals. We’re human beings and we can now not all the time be best possible. We must transfer on and ensure it doesn’t occur once more,” he stated.

After the debate erupted, probably the most board officers, Anirudh Chaudhry, wrote about how the gamers had to be counselled on girls getting used as “honey traps” for nefarious match-fixers.

For now, the very promoting trade that makes the gamers millionaires via branding and advertising and marketing their “coolness”, has cracked the whip. Gillette India has already pulled out of a maintain Pandya. In addition they introduced a #thebestmancanbe marketing campaign with the promotional line that went, “Boys might be boys? Isn’t it time we stopped excusing unhealthy behaviour? Re-think and take motion via becoming a member of us.”

The Khar Gymkhana membership in Mumbai too revoked the three-year club that they had given to Pandya final October, bringing up “adversarial feedback” from their individuals, particularly the ladies who sought after the membership to “take motion and be proactive”.

What is still noticed is what the long run holds for the 2 gamers. They could quickly come again to the staff however will Pandya and Rahul be ceaselessly referred to as the fellows who talked tripe about girls? Or will they be forgiven with time?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.